Improving the question-asking experience. By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy , and our Terms of Service. In essence, I told the package manager to uninstall libc. But there are hundred of packages I feared as much None of these sounded especially fun, mostly because the machine was in a place where it's a hassle to stick a head on it. 
| Uploader: | Akibei |
| Date Added: | 25 March 2010 |
| File Size: | 46.63 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 79101 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Upgrading it for the sake of the Tableau SDK is bad advice. Please enter a title. Gkibc far as it could tell, libc6 was uninstalled and deselected, and every dependency known to man was broken. This is a busybox with all kinds of treats built in, and not a dynamic library in sight.
I just read here that there is security bug in glibc and that it is already fixed.
The GNU C Library (glibc)
Ask Ubuntu is a question and answer site for Ubuntu users and developers. A local attacker could use this to exploit an existing vulnerability more easily. None of these sounded especially fun, mostly because the machine was in a lgibc where it's a hassle to stick a head on it.
Alternatively, you could just statically link the SDK. Type your comment here. Or, if it would be easier for you, email the files to me at dhenke mythopoeic. I'm glad it's working glihc you now.
Reasonably heavy UNIX-geekery ahead. How do I get my system back to a somewhat-working state?
How to install Glibc on CentOS6 - How to install newer versions of glibc on CentOS 6
I get the following error: What do you mean uhuntu saying upgrading glibc "is risky"? Read on after the jump for the full tale. Improving the question-asking experience. If I couldn't fix this, I'd have to re-install anyway Unicorn Meta Zoo 9: Skip if that isn't your cup of ichor.
[SOLVED] GHOST Vunerability - Upgrade Glibc from
So, the solution to your problem may be g,ibc simple as: An attacker could use this to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code. All the usual shell commands worked again. First, if your system is blibc and talking on the network, back up any data you care about before doing anything else. BTW, your website is wonderful, I put it in my bookmark: Screwing this up could turn a working or even partly-working system into a doorstop. An attacker could use to cause a denial of service stack exhaustion leading to an application crash.
Asked 5 years, 10 months ago. So, the first and most obvious problem other than "If you didn't want to do that, then why did you type the command? I don't want to upgrade the whole uuntu.
I totally ignore the words. Bless those ubuntu gnomes. The remaining problem was that the package manager was not best pleased. I recently did something incredibly ill-considered while logged in as root, natch to my Ubuntu gkibc box at home.
No comments:
Post a Comment